Legal Opinion

Strong v. Jackson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 2003No. 76A03-0202-CV-54PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

BARNES, Judge.

We issue this opinion on rehearing for the sole purpose of acknowledging one argument Lloyd Strong now makes regarding the trial court's reformation of the contract to convey real estate to Steve Jackson to provide Strong with an equitable life estate in the property, instead of rescinding the contract altogether. In our original opinion, we addressed and rejected Strong's argument that upon a finding of constructive fraud, a trial court must declare the entire transaction "void" and rescind the contract and may not order any other remedy. Strong v. Jackson,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District v. Chicago Southshore & South Bend RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Strong v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. New Albany Box & Basket Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Hart v. Steel Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Holmes v. RandolphIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Demming v. UnderwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Cheng Song v. Thomas Iatarola and Theresa IatarolaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Bender v. BenderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Indiana State Board of Health Facility Administrators v. WernerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Hudson v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API