Legal Opinion
James T. Mitchell v. 10th and the Bypass, LLC, and Elway, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 28, 2012No. 53A01-1112-PL-593PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
James T. Mitchell appeals from the trial court’s order that vacated partial summary judgment for Mitchell and against 10th and The Bypass, LLC (“the LLC”). The LLC and Elway, Inc. (“Elway”) filed a joint motion to vacate the partial summary judgment and tendered new evidence against Mitchell, and the trial court granted the motion and reinstated Mitchell as a defendant. Mitchell contends that, because the LLC and Elway did not move to alter the thirty-day time limit for the designation of evidence under Trial Rule 56(C) and partial summary judgment was…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Bon Air Hotel, Inc. v. Time, Inc. And Dan JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Dreaded, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Stonger v. SorrellIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Hydranautics v. FilmTec Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- James T. Mitchell v. 10th and The Bypass, LLC and Elway, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Mitchell v. 10th & The Bypass, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Wayne and Donna Kirchgessner v. Betty Kirchgessner, Albert Kirchgessner, Norbert Kirchgessner, Marcella Kirchgessner, Stephen Kirchgessner, Mary Ann Lee, Fred KirchgessnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018