Legal Opinion

United States v. A. Goldmark & Sons Corp.

United States Customs Court

Decided April 3, 1944No. 5992; Entry No. 28041, etcPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

These appeals present for determination the proper dutiable value of canned sardines, exported from Lisbon, Portugal, and entered at the port of New York. The kinds or brands included* in the shipments in question are set forth in the following tabulation:

ConsolidatioD of the cases, for the purposes of trial and decision, was permitted after the parties had agreed that the'merchandise and the issue are substantially the same in all, and that the evidence offered by each side is to be considered as directly applicable to the issues presented.

In the first four of the enumerated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Florea & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Biddle Purchasing Co.United States Customs Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API