Legal Opinion

Vermont National Bank v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 25, 1988No. 86-178PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*478Dooley, J.

This is an action for a deficiency judgment following the sale at public auction of certain collateral. The lower court denied the deficiency because it found that the plaintiff had failed to give proper notice of the sale to defendants. The plaintiff appeals from this ruling.

The plaintiff below, and appellant in this Court, is Vermont National Bank, the secured party. The debtor, Northeast Ecology Systems, Inc., (the company) went bankrupt and the action was tried against Richard and Ann Hamilton (defendants) who were guarantors of the obligation to plaintiff. Defendant, Richard…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Umbaugh Pole Building Co. v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hall v. Owen County State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. DeLay First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Jacobson Appliance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. NatarelliNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Shawmut Worcester County Bank, N.A. v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vermont Industrial Development Authority v. SetzeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Gray v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  3. Gregory Poole Equipment Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Chittenden Trust Co. v. Andre Noel SportsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. JahnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API