Legal Opinion
Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. Natarelli
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1977PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David O. Boehm, J.
By notice of motion dated August 12, 1977, plaintiff, the Chase Manhattan Bank, hereinafter referred to as the bank, moved to dismiss affirmative defenses and counterclaims interposed by the defendant, Shirley Natarelli, hereinafter referred to as Shirley, against plaintiff’s action for deficiency sums due upon a note. Thereafter, by order to show cause, dated August 22, 1977, defendant moved to vacate a default judgment entered in the Monroe County Clerk’s office against her on July 27, 1977, in the amount of $39,969.03, including interest, and to permit…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- General Phoenix Corp. v. CabotNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Camden National Bank v. St. ClairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Indianapolis Morris Plan Corp. v. KarlenNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Umbaugh Pole Building Co. v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. LototskyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- McEntire v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Chemlease Worldwide Inc. v. Brace, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Shawmut Worcester County Bank, N.A. v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.