Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Carr

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1984No. 2737PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

Albert Carr was tried on various criminal charges in the Municipal Court of Philadelphia but was found guilty only of possessing an unlicensed firearm in violation of a particular section of the Uniform Firearms Act set forth at 18 Pa.C.S. § 6106(a).1 After a fine and sentence of probation had been imposed, Carr filed a petition for certiorari in the Court of Common Pleas. This petition was denied, and an appeal was taken to this Court in which Carr contends (1) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction *461and (2) that the firearm should have been suppressed as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. ShoatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Habecker v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Peoples v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. People v. FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RodriquezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. State v. VickersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API