Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gray

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 2006PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 Julius Clinton Gray appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed upon his convictions for possession with intent to deliver cocaine, possession of a small amount of marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Gray challenges the lower court’s order denying his suppression motion. Upon careful review of the record and relevant law, we reverse the order on the suppression motion, vacate the judgment of sentence, and remand for further proceedings.

¶ 2 On May 8, 2003, at 12:30 p.m., Gray was shopping at an auto parts and service store in Lancaster County when…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. RodriquezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. BeasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CartagenaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. MacKSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. BozemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Com. v. Fulton, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Com. v. Alamo, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API