Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Schultz Savo Stores, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1972No. 92PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Three issues are presented on this appeal:(1) Is the parking lot herein a place of employment under the safe-place statute;(2) Was respondent negligent in maintaining the two-inch curb along the triangular area in the parking lot; and(3) Was appellant’s contributory negligence so great as to bar her recovery as a matter of law?

Parking lot as place of employment.

Sec. 101.06, Stats., commonly known as the safe-place statute, imposes upon employers a standard of care, violation of which is negligence. Ermis v. Federal Windows Mfg. Co. (1959), 7 Wis. 2d 549, 555, 97 N. W. 2d 485. The statute…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schwenn v. Loraine Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ermis v. Federal Windows Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Miller v. Welworth TheatresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Peppas v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Stowe v. StoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Holmberg v. Indianhead Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Wacker v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API