Gordon v. Schultz Savo Stores, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Three issues are presented on this appeal:(1) Is the parking lot herein a place of employment under the safe-place statute;(2) Was respondent negligent in maintaining the two-inch curb along the triangular area in the parking lot; and(3) Was appellant’s contributory negligence so great as to bar her recovery as a matter of law?
Parking lot as place of employment.
Sec. 101.06, Stats., commonly known as the safe-place statute, imposes upon employers a standard of care, violation of which is negligence. Ermis v. Federal Windows Mfg. Co. (1959), 7 Wis. 2d 549, 555, 97 N. W. 2d 485. The statute…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schwenn v. Loraine Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Ermis v. Federal Windows Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Miller v. Welworth TheatresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Peppas v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Stowe v. StoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Holmberg v. Indianhead Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Wacker v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2008