Peppas v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*613Wilkie, J.
Two issues are presented on this appeal:
First, is the driveway a place of employment within the meaning of the safe-place statute?
Second, are the owner and the lessee of property abutting a driveway which lies within the boundary of the dedicated public street liable in nuisance for a defect existing in that driveway ?
A preliminary question is raised by respondent Peppas, who, relying on Wells v. Dairyland Mut. Ins. Co.,2 challenges the right of either appellant to relief on this appeal since, as respondent contends, neither moved for a new trial below. However, Gardner, in its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Schwenn v. Loraine Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Brown v. Milwaukee Terminal Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Miller v. Welworth TheatresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Holl v. City of MerrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Physicians Plus Insurance v. Midwest Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Barth v. Downey Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Ampex Corp. v. Sound Institute, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Kull v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.