Legal Opinion

Uhl v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 31, 1928No. 12186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Conviction for receiving and concealing stolen property; punishment, three years in the penitentiary.

The record is béfore us without any statement of facts.

Complaint' is made that at a certain point in the trial objection was made by appellant to testimony, the admissibility of which was urged by the State. The court said in a voice slightly raised, in the presence and hearing of the jury, that “The case was reversed before because of the admission of such testimony.” Exception was reserved to the action of the court, it being claimed that this called the attention of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Coffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Witty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Kirby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. John Derek Allen v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2021
  3. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API