Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1931No. 14300Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

In our original opinion we said that the complaint of argument was untenable because there was no certificate of the trial judge attached to the bill of exception certifying that the evidence referred to and quoted by the district attorney in said argument, was misquoted. Appellant insists that we were in error in so holding. The original bill of exception presenting the complaint is attached to the motion, and is in form exactly as same appears in bill of exception No. 1 in the transcript. The trouble with said bill is that while it sets forth what…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Murff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Poteet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Kirk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Uhl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API