Legal Opinion

James Reeves Contractor, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 19, 1994No. 92-326CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This is an action brought by a prime contractor on behalf of a subcontractor to recover costs arising from the sub’s efforts to satisfy allegedly defective building specifications. The Government has moved for summary judgment on the ground that neither the prime nor the sub have the legal right to recover contract damages from the United States. After considering the briefing and oral argument, the court concludes that the motion is due to be granted.

BACKGROUND

In August 1989 the Navy contracted with the plaintiff (“Reeves”) to build a Navy/Marine Corps Reserve Center…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dunaway v. WH Hopper & Associates, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Severin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  3. Walton v. BourgeoisMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  4. J. L. Simmons Company, Inc., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. Hutto v. JordanMississippi Supreme Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mergentime Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API