Shook v. Bergstrasser Et Ux.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,
When the consideration of a conveyance is a promise to support the grantor, will failure by the grantee to perform justify rescission and cancellation of the conveyance?
William A. Shook, the plaintiff, is the father of defendant, Vesta May Bergstrasser, whose husband is the other defendant, Conrad F. Bergstrasser. Shook has a wife from whom he is separated and four other children. Defendants were the owners of 222 Black-man Street, in the City of Wilkes-Barre, acquired by purchase in 1931,- and which they occupied as their home. Plaintiff loaned…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Leedom v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- McCown v. FraserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Null's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Drob v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Hamberg v. BarskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Frowen v. BlankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Williams v. McCarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Yuhas v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Kalyvas v. KalyvasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.