Legal Opinion
Bolles v. Kinton
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 3, 1928No. 11,745PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
Mbs. Kinton had a verdict and judgment against Doctors Bolles and Starks, osteopathic physicians, jointly, for $6,250 for negligently treating her broken hip.
' The defendants appear separately, but since their arguments on the merits are substantially the same we may treat them together,
Doctor Bolles claims that there was no joint tort. It seems to us clear that there was a joint tort if any. Doctor Bolles was employed, she immediately called in Doctor Starks, who was her son-in-law and lived and offieed with her; plaintiff accepted the services of both and they together made diagnosis and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co. v. FirstbrookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Economy Light & Power Co. v. HillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Cripple Creek Mining Co. v. BrabantSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Colorado Springs & Interurban Railway Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Ballou v. PrescottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Rains v. RainsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
- United States v. Arthur R. Kintner and Alyce KintnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Wilson v. CorbinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.