Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Meehan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1907No. 1,376PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, District Judge.
O. A. Nelson and G. N.. Hensley brought an action against Matt Meehan and T. Larson in December, 1903, in the United States District Court for the territory of Alaska, to compel the specific performance of a contract by which Meehan and Larson agreed to give to the plaintiffs a one-half interest in a certain mining claim, if the plaintiffs would sink thereon three holes to bed rock. The cause was tried by the court, and it was found that the plaintiffs had fulfilled the terms of the contract by sinking three holes to bed rock, and that as a conclusion they were entitled…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Foster-Milburn Co. v. Knight, Chief JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. CallicotteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. McClenachan v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Fair v. Tampa Electric CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.