Legal Opinion

Genesee County Savings Bank v. Rosenthal

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1933No. Docket No. 98, Calendar No. 37,339Published

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants on a promissory note dated December 2, 1931, for $24,700, due 90 days after date, with, interest at 7 per cent, per annum. “Bensams,” a Michigan _corp oration, was maker, and defendants Bernard Rosenthal, Louis Rosenthal, Samuel Weinstein and Maurice Rosenblum were indorsers; and $4,465.14 had been paid on the note prior to suit. The declaration alleges presentment of the note for payment at maturity and tender of a new note executed by the same maker and indorsed by the same indorsers to the payee for the balance due. This note was rejected and suit instituted. From…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bessenger v. WenzelMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Gelder v. WelshMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Jenkins v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API