Clayton v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This appeal requires us to decide whether the Commissioner of Labor abused his discretion in requiring George 0. Clayton to pay unemployment insurance taxes 1 on payments he made to contract workers. We conclude that the commissioner acted permissibly.
In 1974, Clayton was the sole proprietor of North Nenana Wood Specialties, whose business was the cutting and marketing of logs. That year, Clayton bid on and received a lease to harvest timber from a state-owned parcel near Nenana called NC-88. He therefore engaged a number of persons to cut the wood and deliver it to his mill in Nenana.…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Baker v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Schuffenhauer v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1971
- Employment Security Commission v. WilsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Miller v. Washington State Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
4Cited by10 opinions
- Athol Daily News v. Board of Review of the Division of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Employment Security Commission of Wyoming v. Laramie Cabs, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- McPherson Timberlands, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Missouri Ass'n of Realtors v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Alaska Contracting & Consulting, Inc. v. Alaska Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.