Legal Opinion

Schuffenhauer v. Department of Employment Security

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1975No. 43809PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Appellant, Verne Schuffenhauer, is a wholesaler of clams. The Washington Employment Security Department levied an assessment on him for unemployment compensation fund contributions. The department claimed individuals who dug clams for him on his leased tidelands were employed by him within the scope of RCW 50.01 et seq., the Employment Security Act. This order of assessment was upheld by an appeal examiner at a departmental hearing, by the commissioner of the' department and on appeal by the superior court.

The two issues before us are whether the services performed by clam diggers for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Ancheta v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Amburn v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Cowiche Growers, Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Unemployment Compensation Department v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Athol Daily News v. Board of Review of the Division of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Swift v. Island CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hayes v. YountWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Penick v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API