Legal Opinion

Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc. v. Board of Review of the Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1961No. 9321PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice.

Review of a decision of the Industrial Commission’s Board of Review to the effect that plaintiff was liable for contributions to the Utah Unemployment Compensation Fund under the Utah Employment Security Act. Affirmed.

Plaintiff, subsidiary of Aluminum Company of America, has a line of cutlery for sale to the public. It channels it through “distributors,” whose activities invited the-Commission’s decision and this review.

Four witnesses testified,' — two of whom-unquestionably were employees of plaintiff and two of whom were “distributors”' whose “employment” status here is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Creameries of America, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Fuller Brush Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Singer Sewing MacH. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Leach v. BOARD OF REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL COMMISSIONUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Salt Lake Transportation Co. v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Barney v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Barney v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Pro-Benefit Staffing, Inc. v. Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API