Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barney v. Department of Employment Security

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1984No. 19436Published

1DissentHowe, Justice

I dissent. Although this case presents a close question, I do not agree with the majority that the decision of the Board of Review does not fall within the limits of reasonableness and rationality. I am satisfied that there is competent evidence on the basis of which the Department, Board of Review and appeal referee reasonably con-eluded that all three of the A, B and C exclusionary tests had not been met. In such cases, it is our duty to affirm since we are required to canvass the facts in a light most favorable to the findings of the Board of Review. Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc. v. Board of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc. v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API