Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 31, 1992No. 92-1881PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

At issue here is whether an individual involved in a Massachusetts “nominee trust” can assert the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in order to resist a grand jury subpoena seeking trust records. The district court held that no privilege was available because the trust was a “collective entity.” We agree and therefore affirm the order of contempt.

I

In December 1986, appellant John Doe, along with his brother, created a nominee trust (the “Roe trust”) for the purpose of conducting real estate transactions. Doe and his brother designated themselves as the sole beneficiaries…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Roberts v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Culhane v. Aurora Loan ServicesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  4. Amato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  5. Dwire v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API