In Re Grand Jury Subpoena
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
At issue here is whether an individual involved in a Massachusetts “nominee trust” can assert the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in order to resist a grand jury subpoena seeking trust records. The district court held that no privilege was available because the trust was a “collective entity.” We agree and therefore affirm the order of contempt.
I
In December 1986, appellant John Doe, along with his brother, created a nominee trust (the “Roe trust”) for the purpose of conducting real estate transactions. Doe and his brother designated themselves as the sole beneficiaries…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Roberts v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Culhane v. Aurora Loan ServicesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Amato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Dwire v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.