Legal Opinion
Amato v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 8, 2006No. 05-2193PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dr. Steven P. Amato appeals the denial of his motion to quash two administrative subpoenas duces tecum served on him as custodian of records for two corporations in which he was the sole shareholder, director, officer and employee. We affirm.
I
Amato is a chiropractor in Damariscotta, Maine. He has conducted his chiropractor business as a sole proprietorship and as a corporation. In October 1997, Amato incorporated the business as Dr. Steven Am-ato, D.C., P.C. (“Amato P.C.”) in New York and is Amato P.C.’s sole shareholder, director, officer and employee. In…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Issued June 18, 2009Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- High Desert Relief, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. TsarnaevCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Completely Sealed Case: Twelve Grand Jury SubpoenasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.