Legal Opinion

Providian Nat. Bank v. Conner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 1, 2004No. 1021496PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Providian National Bank ("Providian"), the defendant in a proceeding in the Barbour Circuit Court, appeals from the trial court's order denying its motion to compel arbitration of the claims of Tina G. Conner, the plaintiff below. We reverse and remand.

Facts

Conner applied for and received a VISA credit card from Providian.1 In March 2001, Providian mailed to its cardholders a notice of changes in the terms of their credit-card agreements with Providian. Conner's March statement contained the following language, prominently placed on the statement:

"* * * PLEASE SEE ENCLOSED IMPORTANT LEGAL…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vann v. First Community Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Ex Parte Greenstreet, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Tefco Finance Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. SouthTrust Bank v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Ex Parte ColquittSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Adt SEC. Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Wright v. Autauga Heating & Cooling, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Ex Parte Verbena United Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Scurtu v. International Student ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
  5. Owens v. Griffin Wood Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API