Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Greenstreet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 2001No. 1992282PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Greenstreet, Inc., is a defendant in an action filed by Nella Dean Hyde in the Walker Circuit Court. Greenstreet has filed a petition for the writ of mandamus, challenging the correctness of the trial court's order in which it continued Greenstreet's motion to compel arbitration, in order for the plaintiff to conduct discovery "into any area which under Alabama law would operate to revoke or invalidate the arbitration provision." We grant Greenstreet's petition in part and deny it in part.

Facts

Hyde, a 64-year-old woman claiming to have a monthly income of $739, borrowed money from Greenstreet…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Ex Parte General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. BrunoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Sisters of Visitation v. COCHRAN PLASTERING CO. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Ex Parte Inverness Construction CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Elizabeth Homes, LLC v. CatoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Owens v. Coosa Valley Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Ex Parte CainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API