Legal Opinion

Gund v. Parke

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1896No. 2191PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Richard Osborn, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*395The opinion of the-court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

Plaintiff and appellant loaned to one F. L. Stinson the sum of $3,000 and took as collateral security therefor his promissory note for $3,500, payable to Stinson and signed by Stinson and Parke and L. O. Gilman. This action was brought on the collateral note to collect a judgment against Parke only. Fannie M. Parke, wife of the defendant,’ filed a complaint in intervention in which she alleged that she and defendant were the owners of community real property in King county, Washington; that the note sued on was a separate debt of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brotton v. LangertWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. McDonough v. CraigWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Powell v. PughWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Bierer v. BlurockWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Commercial Bank v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schramm v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Anderson v. BurgoyneWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Clark v. EltingeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Woste v. RuggeWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Meng v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API