Legal Opinion

Vokoun v. City of Lake Oswego

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 2002No. CC 96-11-052; CA A101203; SC S47931PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Plaintiffs William and Paula Vokoun (plaintiffs) challenge a decision of the Court of Appeals that reversed a jury verdict in their favor on their claims for inverse condemnation and negligence against the City of Lake Oswego (city) after the trial court denied the city’s motion for a directed verdict on both claims. Vokoun v. City of Lake Oswego, 169 Or App 31, 7 P3d 608 (2000). For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand the case to that court for further proceedings.

I. FACTS

Because the jury found in plaintiffs’ favor, we view the evidence, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Greist v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Stevenson v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of ForestryOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Edwards v. Hallsdale-Powell Utility District Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  3. AGCS Marine Ins. Co. v. Arlington Cnty.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  4. Hughes v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Murrell v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API