Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Hastings & Koch Enterprises, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 22, 1995No. 92-P-1217PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Marlene Mitchell was injured when the motorcycle on which she rode as a passenger was in an accident with an automobile driven by Frank Nowak. To recover for those injuries, she brought this action against Nowak and the automobile’s owner, Hastings & Koch Enterprises, Inc. (Hastings & Koch). Hastings & Koch cross-claimed against Nowak and filed a third-party complaint against Steven Hunter and Ray Stone Pontiac, thought to be the operator and owner, respectively, of the motorcycle. Mitchell amended her complaint to state claims against the same two defendants. A jury, on special questions,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gordon v. BedardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Leone v. DoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. O'CONNOR v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Barbosa v. HOPPER FEEDS. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. ELM Medical Laboratories, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Hasbro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Demoulas v. DemoulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Shantigar Foundation v. Bear Mountain BuildersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Peters v. Haymarket Leasing, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  5. Picard v. ThomasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API