Legal Opinion

Mikkelsen v. Haslam

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 28, 1988No. 880291-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant DaNiece Mikkelsen (“Mrs. Mikkelsen”) appeals from a judgment of no cause of action in a malpractice action against defendant-respondent Dr. Marian J. Haslam, (“Dr. Haslam”) based on a jury verdict which found Mrs. Mikkelsen and Dr. Haslam equally negligent. She also appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial and/or for entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict in her favor on the issue of liability. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

Mrs. Mikkelsen was born with a congenitally dislocated right hip which restricted her…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Kelly v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Largess v. TatemSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Olympus Hills Shopping Center, Ltd. v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  2. Pacific Chromalox Division, Emerson Electric Co. v. IreyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. Carpet Barn v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. Knapstad v. Smith's Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Ghionis v. Deer Valley Resort Co., Ltd.District Court, D. Utah · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API