State v. Plastow
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] The State, by way of -intermediate appeal, • challenges the circuit court’s suppression of Alvin Plastow’s admission that he raped a three-year old girl. The circuit court suppressed the admission in accordance with our cases holding that a conviction cannot stand on an admission alone: the admission must be corroborated with independent evidence establishing the corpus delicti of the offense. 1 Many state and federal courts have adopted a more flexible rule. Instead of requiring evidence of the corpus delicti, those courts allow evidence of the admission’s…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BariteauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. KruegerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. KukertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Dirk Sparks v. Matthew ShaverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Richardson v. RichardsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.