Legal Opinion

State v. Plastow

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2015No. 27374PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The State, by way of -intermediate appeal, • challenges the circuit court’s suppression of Alvin Plastow’s admission that he raped a three-year old girl. The circuit court suppressed the admission in accordance with our cases holding that a conviction cannot stand on an admission alone: the admission must be corroborated with independent evidence establishing the corpus delicti of the offense. 1 Many state and federal courts have adopted a more flexible rule. Instead of requiring evidence of the corpus delicti, those courts allow evidence of the admission’s…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BariteauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. KruegerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. KukertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Dirk Sparks v. Matthew ShaverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  5. Richardson v. RichardsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API