Legal Opinion

State v. Bariteau

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 2016No. 27567PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERN, Justice.

[¶ 1.] On June 25, 2015, a jury convicted Timothy J. Bariteau of sexual contact with a child under sixteen years, of age in violation of SDCL 22-22-7. Bariteau appeals his conviction alleging the circuit court erred in refusing to grant his motion for judgment of acquittal on the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence. He also alleges that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct by making a misstatement of law during closing arguments, which Bariteau claims constitutes plain error. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] In sixth grade, H.S. started attending youth group at Morningside…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. BrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. McMillenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. McMillenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Reck v. S.D. Bd. of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. BryantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Reck v. S.D. Bd. of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API