Legal Opinion
Richard Thomas v. Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 28, 2012No. 64A03-1204-PL-191PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRADFORD, Judge.
Approximately three and one-half years after receiving his third qualifying driving conviction within a ten-year period, Richard Thomas received notice from the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles that, pursuant to Indiana Code section 9-30-10-4(b), he qualified as a habitual traffic violator, and, as a result, that his driving privileges would be suspended for a period often years. Thomas requested relief on administrative review. This request was denied. Thomas subsequently filed a petition for judicial review of the Bureau’s determination claiming that the Bureau did…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992
- Pflanz v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Simon v. City of Auburn, Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ripley County Board of Zoning Appeals v. Rumpke of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Hannon v. Metropolitan Development CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Peoples State Bank v. Benton Township of Monroe County, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Orndorff v. Indiana Bureau of Motor VehiclesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- City of Hammond v. John RostankovskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020