Legal Opinion

Pflanz v. Foster

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2008No. 36S01-0710-CV-425PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

The question here is whether a property owner’s claim for contribution toward environmental cleanup costs is barred by the statute of limitation if the owner should have known about the contamination more than ten years before the complaint was filed. We hold that the statute of limitation does not begin to run until the owner is ordered to cleanup the property, regardless of whether an owner earlier knew or should have known about the need for cleanup.

Facts and Procedural History

Taking all the allegations in the complaint to be true, the facts are as follows. In 1976,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wehling v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bourbon Mini-Mart, Inc. v. Gast Fuel & Services, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. McLochlin v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. TLB Plastics Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Paper Products Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Terra-Products, Inc. v. Kraft General Foods, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. BankertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Cooper Industries, LLC v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Kb Home Indiana Inc. v. Rockville Tbd Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Stickdorn v. ZookIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. de Vries v. L & L Custom BuildersNebraska Supreme Court · 2021

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API