Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Mimnaugh

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1903PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From Union: Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judge. Suit by A. E. Eaton and. others against J. H. Mimnaugh, County Clerk of Union County, to restrain the latter from giving notice of a special election for the relocation of the county seat of Union County, and incurring the necessary expense incident thereto. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and from the resulting decree plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

delivered the opinion..

This suit involves the constitutionality of an act of the legislature of 1903 for the relocation of the county seat of Union County (Laws 1903, p. 104), declaring that a special election shall be held on the first Monday in November, 1903, for the purpose stated, defining the duties of the county clerk in connection with such election, and prescribing the qualifications of voters thereat, and the manner of conducting the same. It is also provided that no place shall be voted for except the cities of Union and La Grande; that, if La Grande shall receive 55 per cent of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Lake County v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Law v. People ex rel. HuckIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Buchanan v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. City of Springfield v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. DeFazio v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Moses v. MeierOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Rorick v. Dalles CityOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Brewster v. Deschutes CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API