Damms v. Humboldt Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 125 and 126, Oct. T., 1909, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1906, Nos. 480 and 481, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Caroline Damms v. Humboldt Fire Insurance Company. Assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance.
Read the full summary
Appeals, Nos. 125 and 126, Oct. T., 1909, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1906, Nos. 480 and 481, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Caroline Damms v. Humboldt Fire Insurance Company. Assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance. Before Frazer, P. J. At the trial a verdict was returned for the plaintiff for $2,201.50. On a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, Frazer, P. J., filed the following opinion: This was an action to recover upon a policy of insurance upon buildings located upon certain real estate situated in Derry township, Westmoreland county,…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
These cases were tried together and involve the same questions. The judgment in each is affirmed on the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas.
2Cited by15 opinions
- Arlotte v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Hoffman v. Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Thomas v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. Ltd. of LondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Clymer Opera Co. v. Flood City Mutual Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Isaac v. Donegal & Conoy Mut. Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.