Legal Opinion

Isaac v. Donegal & Conoy Mut. Fire Ins.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1932No. Appeal, 63PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

We have partially considered the facts in this case in Isaac v. D. & C. M. F. Ins. Co., 301 Pa. 351, and they need not all be restated. The fire occurred on July 4th, and on the 17th the adjuster was given an inventory showing a loss of approximately $2,400; thereafter the goods, consisting of merchandise, were transferred to a warehouse, and sold on the 8th of August. The proof of loss showed the loss as over $5,000. The insurer contends that recovery should be limited to the loss shown by the inventory made July 17th, because it had not been given a sufficient…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Phœnix Ins. v. SpiersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  2. Carpenter v. German American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Evans v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Caldwell v. Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Gough v. HalperinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Arlotte v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Harris v. Meyers (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Judge v. Celina Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. St. Louis Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. WitneyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. First National Bank v. Monarch Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API