Isaac v. Donegal & Conoy Mut. Fire Ins.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
We have partially considered the facts in this case in Isaac v. D. & C. M. F. Ins. Co., 301 Pa. 351, and they need not all be restated. The fire occurred on July 4th, and on the 17th the adjuster was given an inventory showing a loss of approximately $2,400; thereafter the goods, consisting of merchandise, were transferred to a warehouse, and sold on the 8th of August. The proof of loss showed the loss as over $5,000. The insurer contends that recovery should be limited to the loss shown by the inventory made July 17th, because it had not been given a sufficient…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Phœnix Ins. v. SpiersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
- Carpenter v. German American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Evans v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Caldwell v. Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Gough v. HalperinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Arlotte v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Harris v. Meyers (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Judge v. Celina Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- St. Louis Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. WitneyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- First National Bank v. Monarch Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.