Legal Opinion

Obolensky v. Danielson

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1958No. Civ. No. 22740PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HERNDON, J. pro tem.*

In proceedings instituted pursuant to section 1080 et seq. of the Probate Code, appellant sought a determination that she was the pretermitted daughter of Fritz O. Fernstrom, the decedent. In her petition she alleged that she was the only child of the decedent; that she was born in France in 1922 after her mother had procured an interlocutory decree of divorce from the decedent, but before rendition of the final decree; that decedent’s will made no provision for her; that she had received no portion of decedent’s property by way of advancement; and that decedent’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of TrickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. In Re Estate of HassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Estate of LindsayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. In Re Estate of MinearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Van Strien v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of FernstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API