Legal Opinion

Lidberg v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 20, 1974No. 4-73-Civil 165PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACTS, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER

LARSON, District Judge.

The parties have filed a stipulation of facts.

In October, 1966, Wilbur Milton and family formed A & H Machinery Erectors, Inc. (hereinafter A & H), a Minnesota corporation, to perform millwright work and related activities and to continue work in process by Milton. From August, 1966, until early in January, 1967, Carl Lidberg (hereinafter the taxpayer) worked with Milton and then A & H on these jobs.

The taxpayer subsequently brought an action in Hennepin County District Court in the State of Minnesota for an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Casey v. GranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Underwood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  3. In Re CrockettDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
  4. In re the Arbitration between Camhi & Undergarment & Negligee Workers Union, Local 62New York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. United States v. RossDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tony Thornton Auction Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Tony Thornton Auction Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API