Legal Opinion
Tulsa St. Ry. Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 22, 1910No. 1107PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from the Corporation Commission. Action by the State against the Tulsa Street Eailway Company. From an-order of the Corporation Commission, defendant appeals. Citing: C., B. I. & P. Ry. Go. v. State, 24 Oída. 370; Begem v. Loan & Trust, Go., 154 U. S. 352; A., T. é S. F. Ry. Co. v. State, 23 Okla. 210; W. Ü. Tel. Go. v. Railroad Com., 74 Miss. 80; Railway Go. v. Becher, 35 Fed. 883.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.
September 9, 1909, on a complaint duly filed, the Corporation Commission of the state made the following order in the above-entitled case:
“The complaint alleges in substance that the defendant owns and operates a street railway system in the town of Tulsa, and that it has a road built and in operation from the city of Tulsa to the fair grounds; that it only runs cars from this part of its system during fairs or some other amusements by which people are attracted to the fair grounds; that it operates its main system within about a half mile of the fair grounds. The complaint prays that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Cunningham v. JackU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1902
- Sherwood v. Atlantic & Danville Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. NewellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Scott v. BrakelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Dorsett v. State Ex Rel. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Board of Com'rs of Noble County v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Southern Railway Co. v. HatchettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.