Legal Opinion

Sherwood v. Atlantic & Danville Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 11, 1897PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Original application for a writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Sherwood and others presented their petition to this court praying that a writ of mandamus might issue requiring the Atlantic & Danville R. R. Oo. to replace its tracks from Shoulders Hill to its former terminal station in the city of Portsmouth, and re-establish it as the terminal station of its line, and to establish and maintain.its general offices, freight and passenger depots, within the city of Portsmouth, Ya.

To this petition the Atlantic & Danville R. R. Oo. Sled its answer, and depositions were taken upon behalf both of petitioner and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. State v. Hartford & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  3. Hoard v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. State v. Sioux City & Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  5. People v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburgh RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. Franklin & Pittsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  3. Posey v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  4. Selectmen of Amesbury v. Citizens Electric Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. HewinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API