Legal Opinion
Berger v. Quintero
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 5, 1930No. 29548PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.
L'1] This is a suit for $5,354.12, paid to defendant, as plaintiff’s attorney, by Emile Pomes, notary public, in a partition of the effects of the succession of plaintiff’s mother, Anna G. Czarnowski, widow of Peter St. Amand. The validity of the payment, made by the notary to defendant, was recognized by this court in the Succession of Czarnowski, 158 La. 1093, 105 So. 76.
On the day that defendant received the foregoing amount from the notary, he made out an itemized statement of the amount which he considered due the firm, of which he was a member, for legal services rendered in matters…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scheffenacker v. HoopesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- New Orleans Terminal Co. v. TellerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Bassick Gold Mine Co. v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Drewry-Hughes Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- St. Regis Paper Company v. . Tonawanda Board Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Fischbach and Moore, Inc. v. Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Davis-Wood Lumber Co. v. Farnsworth & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Selber Bros. v. Newstadt's Shoe StoresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- López Delgado v. South Porto Rico Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1943
- Sartor v. United Gas Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.