Legal Opinion

State v. Nance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 2002No. COA01-353PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

On 20 September 2000, a jury found Carolyn Nance (“defendant”) guilty of six counts of misdemeanor cruelty to an animal. Before trial, defendant made a motion to suppress evidence seized by animal control officers without a warrant. Specifically, defendant objected to the officers’ seizure of six horses owned by defendant. Defendant’s motion to suppress came before the trial court on 18 September 2000, at which time the trial court made the following pertinent findings of fact:

5. On December 18, 1998, Animal Control Officers received a telephone call . . . concerning…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BallanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. GriceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API