State v. Alexander
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Defendant Darius Cordale Alexander appeals from an order denying, in part, his motion to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search of a trailer parked in front of his mobile home. On appeal, defendant contends that the challenged search and seizure were not reasonable under the plain view doctrine because the criminal nature of the items was not immediately apparent and the officers did not have legal right of access to the items seized. We hold that the findings of fact support the trial court’s conclusion that the criminal nature of the items was immediately apparent.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.