Osman v. Traphagen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oakland Circuit. Tbe statement of facts in tbe opinion is sufficiently full.
1Opinion of the CourtG-raves, J.
This was ejectment by Traphagen to recover two separate parcels of land in Oakland county.
The case was tried without a jury, and the facts found, so far as relevant to the points raised, are as follows:
In September, 1846, Nathaniel Traphagen, the father of defendant in error, died, seized of the land, leaving Mary Traphagen, his widow, and the defendant in error, his son and only heir; that letters of administration were issued to the widow and to Abraham H. Traphagen, the father of decedent, who regularly qualified and entered upon the trust and continued in office until the estate was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McGoon v. ScalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Cunningham v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Howard v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
- Goudy v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
- American Insurance v. FiskNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
3Cited by12 opinions
- King v. MerrittMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Griffin v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Action Auto, Inc v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Blackman v. MulhallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Johnson v. DayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.