Legal Opinion

King v. Merritt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1887PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Calhoun. (Hooker, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error. The facte are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

This action is ejectment, brought to recover possession of an undivided interest in blocks 55 and 58 in the village of Verona, in the county of Calhoun, which includes certain mill privileges. The cause was tried in the Calhoun circuit by jury in March, 1887,-and verdict and judgment were rendered for the defendant.

*197The declaration contains five counts, each claiming a different interest.

The claim in the first count is to an undivided half of said blocks, according to the recorded plat of said village,—

“ Located on the north half of section five, in town two south, of range seven west, and of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ford v. FordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Carpenter v. DexterSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Chandler v. SpearSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850
  4. Hogan v. KurtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Jackson ex dem. Hardenbergh v. SchoonmakerNew York Supreme Court · 1809

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Neal v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Sipes v. McGheeMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Butterfield v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  4. Coates v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Beall v. McMenemyNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API