Eisenhauer v. Clock Towers Associates
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEMURO, Judge:
Appellants Charles and Margaret Eisenhauer brought this action for conversion and unjust enrichment against appellees Clock Towers Associates, The Karsan Group, Inc., Irwin Terach, Barry Lyman and Julian Levin. At the close of plaintiffs-appellants’ evidence in a non-jury trial, the trial court granted appellees’ request for a compulsory nonsuit. Appellants bring this appeal from the trial court’s denial of their request for removal of the nonsuit. We hold that the trial court erred in granting the nonsuit, and reverse and remand this case for further proceedings.
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stevenson v. Economy Bank of AmbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Shonberger v. OswellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Storm v. GoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Sparler v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Corbett v. WeisbandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Poleri v. SalkindSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Krajewski v. American Honda Finance Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. B.J.M., Jr., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. StellaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.