Legal Opinion

Poleri v. Salkind

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 1996No. 02299PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, President Judge.

Appellants, Barbara L. Poleri and John Poleri, have taken this appeal from the order of May 23,1995, which denied their motion for post-trial relief and affirmed the compulsory non-suit which had been entered in favor of appellees. We are constrained to vacate the order entering the compulsory non-suit and remand for a new trial.

The facts underlying the instant appeal have been aptly summarized in the opinion of the trial court:

In 1988, 59 year-old plaintiff, Barbara L. Poleri, consulted her family physician, Dr. Kagen, regarding her history of back pain which began…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Jones v. Montefiore HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Mitzelfelt v. KamrinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Wilkes-Barre Iron & Wire Works, Inc. v. Pargas of Wilkes-Barre, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Montgomery v. South Philadelphia Medical Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Reading Radio, Inc. v. FinkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Mahan v. Am-Gard, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. International Diamond Importers, Ltd. v. Singularity Clark, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Hong v. PelagattiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Joyce v. Boulevard Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Center, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API