Legal Opinion
Hinds Investments, L.P. v. Angioli
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 1, 2011No. 10-15607, 10-15951PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Hinds Investments, L.P. and Patricia McLaughlin (collectively, “Hinds”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their claims against manufacturers of dry cleaning equipment brought, inter alia, under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq. 1 RCRA permits citizen suits against “any person ... who has contributed or who is contributing to the past or present handling, storage, treatment, transportation, or disposal of any solid or hazardous waste which may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare System, LPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Bruce Goldfarb v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Meghan Mollett v. Netflix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Gregory Village Partners, L.P. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Carlos Castro v. Cal TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.