Legal Opinion
Rankin v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 12, 2003No. 2D01-3990PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
861 So.2d 1222 (2003)
Robert W. RANKIN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D01-3990.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
December 12, 2003.
2Per curiam
Robert W. Rankin challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his motion and amended motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm without prejudice to Rankin filing a facially sufficient claim under rule 3.850 regarding two of the four grounds that he asserted in his motions.
The attachments to the trial court's order show that in trial court case number 97-9354,…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Richie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Kleppinger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Peters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Tatum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Towery v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008