Legal Opinion

Peters v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 12, 2003No. 2D03-2630PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Japheth Peters challenges the order of the trial court summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Peters presented a facially sufficient claim that his plea was involuntarily entered because it was entered in reliance on the misadvice of counsel, and the attachments to the trial court’s order do not conclusively refute Peters’ claim. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Peters was charged by information with capital sexual battery. The State alleged that between January 31, 2000, and February 7, 2000, Peters…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Neal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Rankin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thornton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Charles Wigglesworth v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
  3. DAVID W. HOLMES v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. Erin Vickers v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
  5. JOSE GUERRERO LOZANO, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API