Legal Opinion
Skidmore v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 5, 1997No. 96-2343PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
688 So.2d 1014 (1997)
Daniel Joseph SKIDMORE, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-2343.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 5, 1997.
Daniel Joseph Skidmore, in pro per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON and SHEVIN, JJ., and BARKDULL, Senior Judge.
BARKDULL, Senior Judge.
The defendant appeals the summary denial of his 3.850 motion. Because he entered a plea of nolo contendere as part of a negotiated plea bargain[1] in 1986 and his convictions became final in 1989, most of his claims are time barred. See Gust v. State, 535…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jolly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Gust v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Gainer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Salazar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Dunenas v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Mortimer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Bover v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Corp. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Vidak v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.